Tuesday, April 30, 2013

The Wankhede was right, Kohlisaab

Anyone who has been to a game in Mumbai knows how partisan the crowd is. For years, foreign teams have been abused during matches at the Wankhede. Truth be told, they're abused at other venues as well but the people who are paid to offer opinion would like us to think otherwise. The difference is only in the degree and type of abuse meted out.

There have even been instances where crowds have turned on the home team itself, most famously when the Eden Gardens crowd jeered Sunil Gavaskar after he dropped Kapil Dev & when Greg Chappell dropped Sourav Ganguly. More recently, we've seen Indian fans rejoice at the fall of an Indian wicket just because it meant Sachin Tendulkar would come out to bat.

Whether I or anyone else thinks such behaviour is justified or not is irrelevant. Fans who come to the stadium do so at the cost of their time and money. It is their passion that ensures the players now get paid the kind of money that they wouldn't have dreamt of a decade ago. The endorsements they have, the central & IPL contracts they've earned are a result of millions of people turning up to watch them play in sub-standard facilities in ridiculously oppressive weather conditions and being treated like they're a nuisance. These fans have a right to voice their opinion as long as they don't resort to physical violence.

So when Virat Kohli points a finger at the Wankhede crowd after being heckled because he refused to withdraw a run out appeal in which Ambati Rayudu's bat was knocked away off Vinay Kumar's foot, I can't help but disagree with him. Here's what he had to say:

"I don't know what is wrong with people in this venue. It feels a bit weird because at the end of the day you play for India and you don't come here to be hated," Kohli said. "It has happened to a few players in the past as well. I don't know why they get so worked up during IPL. IPL is not the end of the world. They forget that the players they are booing for also play for their country."
First off, I remember the Chinnaswamy crowd boo Gautam Gambhir a few weeks ago at the post-match ceremony after he got into an altercation with none other than Virat Kohli. An altercation that Kohli could have easily avoided. Instead, he chose not to. So while he got worked up & got into an argument with a fellow Indian player during an IPL game, a tournament that is not the end of the world according to him, he seems to think the crowd shouldn't.
What is even more alarming is the subtle implication that a player can be booed if he doesn't play for "their country". So if you're an overseas player, you're fair game if one goes by Kohli's reasoning. In a more evolved & globally aware environment, his words would have been considered bigoted.
Here's something more he had to say:
"It is only creating hatred among the players. When I come back and play for India, they are going to cheer for me. It doesn't work that way."
Newsflash, Mr. Kohli: This is exactly how it works all over the world. Footballers get abused, some of them racially, when they play an away game in their league. The same players are egged on just as passionately when they turn out for the national side. If you think it is okay for the crowd to heckle your opposition in an international game, you better not complain when that crowd heckles you when you're playing on the away team in a club game. And if you think the IPL is not the end of the world, don't pick a fight with your national teammate when you get out. It doesn't give you the right to tell the fans what they can or can't do, but atleast your stance would be consistent and you won't end up looking like a sore loser.
The Wankhede was right, Kohlisaab. And they got under your skin, which is exactly what home advantage is all about. The sooner you come to terms with this, the sooner you'll be able to evolve into a leader capable of captaining the Indian team if that is what you aspire to.

5 comments:

  1. Not a fan of Kohli but this is a poor response to his rambling IMO. Just because we have these hordes of hooligans masquerading as fans in football, doesn't mean we bring the same culture to cricket. Two wrongs don't make a right.
    Chennai crowd has shown time and again that they can treat a visiting club side with the same amount as respect as they would with Pakistan. Home advantage is about backing your own side, not about abusing the opposition. Its high time we as Mumbaikar's (and to a fair extent, the Eden Gardens crowd) realise it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Strange that you seem to miss out on misbehaviour by players, although you do clearly say that you aren't a Kohli fan. I'm not talking about Kohli alone. It's time some players realise & admit that they happen to be representing something that's called a gentleman's game and should show at least traces of gentlemanliness, at least on the field. If good behaviour isn't something they've learnt since childhood, I guess they'll never learn. So, like any errant human, you take what comes with your behaviour. Don't blame the crowd. That's another issue and it isn't right in any way either. But if the player has misbehaved, he is the last one who should be complaining. He should be apologising.... unless he hasn't even learnt that since childhood.
      Just because they earn packs (sometimes undeservingly)does not licence them to misbehave.

      Delete
  2. Rahul9:59 PM

    Lame article. Just because X happens all the time doesnt justify Y. Kohli was wrong in taking on Gambhir. Period. Football fans are wrong when they (racially or otherwise) abuse players. Period. The crowd was wrong in continuously abusing Kohli. Period.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sorry to say but in Eden and India, DADA is GOD

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous11:17 PM

    Please note that the hooliganism is part and parcel "In a more evolved & globally aware environment". I hope other grounds in India follows Wankhade and evolve more and become more globally aware so that they can take get involved in hooliganism as well.

    ReplyDelete